About the BMC Series
29/04/ · Editorial Assessment | Reedsy. Editorial Assessment and Peer Review Process Scholarly peer review in scientific journals is a quality control mechanism, where an author’s scholarly work, research, or ideas are subjected to a critical evaluation undertaken by experts specializing in the related area, prior Manuscripts submitted to BMC Public Health are assessed by our editors and/or This will not negatively impact editorial assessment as BMC Research Notes aims to make single observations available to the scientific community. We are not looking for a detailed and lengthy introduction to the topic and authors should instead cite relevant review articles You must be task-focused and work towards deadlines. This role reports into the Editorial Quality Manager and provides expert oversight of the initial assessment step of BMC Series and Scientific
When should I seek an editorial assessment?
You must be task-focused and work towards deadlines. This role reports into the Editorial Quality Manager and provides expert oversight of the initial assessment step of BMC Series and Scientific This will not negatively impact editorial assessment as BMC Research Notes aims to make single observations available to the scientific community. We are not looking for a detailed and lengthy introduction to the topic and authors should instead cite relevant review articles 05/03/ · I received “minor revision” for my paper and resubmitted the revised manuscript. After the resubmission was competed the status of the manuscript was finally changed to “under review” after “editorial assessment” after 6 months. For all subsequent follow ups I received the following reply “the responsible editor already decided to recommend, but the decision by a senior editor is
BMC Public Health | Peer-review policy
This will not negatively impact editorial assessment as BMC Research Notes aims to make single observations available to the scientific community. We are not looking for a detailed and lengthy introduction to the topic and authors should instead cite relevant review articles 05/03/ · I received “minor revision” for my paper and resubmitted the revised manuscript. After the resubmission was competed the status of the manuscript was finally changed to “under review” after “editorial assessment” after 6 months. For all subsequent follow ups I received the following reply “the responsible editor already decided to recommend, but the decision by a senior editor is 29/04/ · Editorial Assessment | Reedsy. Editorial Assessment and Peer Review Process Scholarly peer review in scientific journals is a quality control mechanism, where an author’s scholarly work, research, or ideas are subjected to a critical evaluation undertaken by experts specializing in the related area, prior Manuscripts submitted to BMC Public Health are assessed by our editors and/or
Related questions
26/04/ · Image integrity and standards Cropped gels and blots can be included in editorial assessment bmc main text if it improves the clarity and conciseness of the presentation. In such cases, the cropping of the blot must be clearly evident and must be mentioned in the figure legend This will not negatively impact editorial assessment as BMC Research Notes aims to make single observations available to the scientific community. We are not looking for a detailed and lengthy introduction to the topic and authors should instead cite relevant review articles 05/03/ · I received “minor revision” for my paper and resubmitted the revised manuscript. After the resubmission was competed the status of the manuscript was finally changed to “under review” after “editorial assessment” after 6 months. For all subsequent follow ups I received the following reply “the responsible editor already decided to recommend, but the decision by a senior editor is
Why an editorial assessment if I can get a full content edit directly?
26/04/ · Image integrity and standards Cropped gels and blots can be included in editorial assessment bmc main text if it improves the clarity and conciseness of the presentation. In such cases, the cropping of the blot must be clearly evident and must be mentioned in the figure legend This will not negatively impact editorial assessment as BMC Research Notes aims to make single observations available to the scientific community. We are not looking for a detailed and lengthy introduction to the topic and authors should instead cite relevant review articles 29/04/ · Editorial Assessment | Reedsy. Editorial Assessment and Peer Review Process Scholarly peer review in scientific journals is a quality control mechanism, where an author’s scholarly work, research, or ideas are subjected to a critical evaluation undertaken by experts specializing in the related area, prior Manuscripts submitted to BMC Public Health are assessed by our editors and/or
No comments:
Post a Comment